A short diagnostic can confirm the most suitable starting point before enrolment.
Current programme rhythm · IB Chemistry HL Exam Preparation
Weekly commitment at a glance
From current offering data
Programme length
15 weeks
Live sessions each week
Confirmed per cohort
Session duration
Confirmed per cohort
Total contact hours
45 hours
Independent practice
Allow about 3–4 hours each week beyond the 3 live contact hours.
Feedback turnaround
Submitted work is normally returned within three working days.
Parent-summary cadence
At agreed programme checkpoints
Time zone
Vietnam time (UTC+7)
Timetable status
3 sessions per week · exact times arranged together
The current offering remains the authoritative source for dates, times and availability.
Why this programme exists
The programme turns syllabus coverage into observable capability: choosing models, using evidence, completing multi-stage reasoning and correcting recurring errors.
Expected change
Combine concepts across demanding HL questions
Work efficiently through multi-step calculations
Interpret unfamiliar evidence
Construct precise chemical explanations
Build a personal final revision plan from clear evidence
IB Chemistry examination skills
Three papers. Three different performance demands.
The Chemistry overlaps, but each paper rewards a different way of working. Preparation combines paper-specific practice with one shared system for correcting lost marks.
Parallel assessment demands
Paper 1A
Multiple-choice questions
Core demandFast chemical decision-making.
Students practise
Multiple-choice reasoning
Efficient calculations
Using the Data Booklet
Eliminating distractors
Recognising common traps
Managing time
Evidence trackedAccuracy, error type and time per question set.
Paper 1B
Data-based questions
Core demandReasoning from experimental and unfamiliar data.
Students practise
Interpreting tables and graphs
Identifying variables
Recognising trends and anomalies
Evaluating experimental evidence
Explaining observations precisely
Evidence trackedData interpretation, justification and experimental reasoning.
Paper 2
Written responses
Core demandMaking chemical reasoning visible.
Students practise
Multi-stage calculations
Units and significant figures
Written explanations
Command terms
Extended and integrated responses
Evidence trackedMethod marks, chemical precision and completeness.
One shared improvement recordResults from every paper feed into the student’s personal error log and next revision priorities.
Knowledge
Method
Explanation
Data interpretation
Timing
From lost marks to lasting improvement
Every error must change what happens next.
Another paper is not enough. Each lost mark is diagnosed, repaired and retested until the learning can be used independently in a new context.
The correction sequence
1
Attempt
Complete the question without looking at the solution.
2
Mark
Mark strictly and identify exactly where credit was lost.
3
Classify
Was the problem knowledge, method, explanation, data interpretation or timing?
4
Repair
Relearn the concept or practise the missing method deliberately.
5
Redo
Solve or rewrite the answer independently without the markscheme.
6
Retry later
Test the same idea in a different question after a delay.
Retry laterThe error is closed only when it does not return in a new context.Attempt
Return to mixed practice with stronger evidence.
The error log records the cause, repair action, retry date and later result.
Entry check
Complete a short diagnostic before joining
Show secure prerequisite calculations and explanations
Commit to the live lessons and independent practice
How the programme adapts
Diagnose. Understand. Apply. Track.
Each cycle uses new evidence to decide what the student should work on next.
1
Diagnose
Identify the immediate gap or recurring error.
Example in this programmeComplete a short diagnostic before joining
2
Understand
Build the chemical explanation behind the topic.
Example in this programmeFour phases, one evidence trail
3
Apply
Use the understanding in IB-style work.
Example in this programmeCombine concepts across demanding HL questions
4
Track
Record progress and define the next priority.
Example in this programmeSubmitted work is normally returned within three working days.
A concrete teaching example
Incomplete response
Four phases, one evidence trail
More past papers without a diagnosis of why marks are lost.
Developed response or feedback
Weeks 1–3 diagnose, weeks 4–8 repair, weeks 9–12 integrate and weeks 13–15 simulate, with error patterns tracked between phases.
Paper-specific methods come first, targeted content repair follows, and the final weeks turn stronger understanding into reliable timed performance.
Higher Level
HL Exam Preparation roadmap
15weeks
Phase 1Week 1
Diagnose
Focus
HL diagnostic assessment and strategy
Phase 2Weeks 2–4
Train paper skills
Focus
Paper 1A, Paper 1B and multi-stage Paper 2 methods
Phase 3Weeks 5–12
Integrate and repair
Focus
Structural, quantitative, energetic, equilibrium and mechanistic HL content
Phase 4Weeks 13–15
Simulate and personalise
Focus
Integrated timed sections and full Paper 1 and Paper 2 simulations
The detailed week-by-week plan beneath this roadmap shows the lessons within each phase.
Course plan
View the week-by-week plan
Week 1 — Diagnostic assessment and HL exam strategy
Week 2 — Paper 1A: advanced multiple choice and quantitative reasoning
Week 3 — Paper 1B: experimental and data-based analysis
Week 4 — Multi-step quantitative chemistry and method marks
Week 5 — Advanced atomic structure, bonding and periodicity
Week 6 — Organic structure, classification and analytical evidence
Week 7 — Energetics, energy cycles and entropy
Week 8 — Kinetics, rate laws and mechanisms
Week 9 — Quantitative equilibrium
Week 10 — Acid-base equilibria, buffers and titration systems
Week 11 — Redox chemistry, electrochemical cells and electrolysis
Week 12 — Organic mechanisms and multistep synthesis
Week 13 — Integrated timed Paper 1 and Paper 2 sections
Week 14 — Full Paper 1 simulation and correction
Week 15 — Full Paper 2 simulation and personalised final revision plan
Practice, feedback and parent visibility
Submitted work is normally returned within three working days. Feedback marks the point at which the reasoning broke down and turns recurring errors into later practice.
The student receives
Focused assignments between live lessons
Human feedback linked to the first broken reasoning step
A clear next practice priority in the learning space
A parent can see
Attendance and completion patterns
Recurring error areas and current priorities
A concise progress summary at agreed checkpoints
Workload and attendance
Allow about 3–4 hours each week beyond the 3 live contact hours.
When an enrolled student gives notice that they will miss a class, a private catch-up video is offered with the materials and catch-up priority. This is either the lesson recording where consent and format allow, or a tutor-recorded recap. A missed group lesson is not automatically replaced one-to-one.
Delivery and current place requests
Applications not open yetHL-EXAM-2027-FEB-OI
Online nationwide · Individual
Starts
15 Feb 2027
Schedule
3 sessions per week · exact times arranged together
Individual
One individual place
Hourly tuition
₫750,000
Applications not open yetHL-EXAM-2027-FEB-OG
Online nationwide · Group
Starts
15 Feb 2027
Schedule
Schedule to be agreed later, based on student availability.
places available
10 places available
Total tuition
₫9,900,000
Course reservation
Total tuition
₫9,900,000
Reservation deposit
₫2,000,000
Remaining tuition
₫7,900,000
Cohort confirmation
1 Feb 2027
Remaining tuition due
8 Feb 2027
No payment is collected on this website. The timetable and written terms must be accepted before any verified payment guidance is sent.
Questions about this programme
What does the entry diagnostic involve?
It is a short, low-pressure sample of prerequisite calculations and explanations. It is used to protect programme fit, not to promise or predict a grade.
Are lessons recorded?
Yes—a private catch-up video is offered when an enrolled student gives notice that they will miss a class. Where the lesson format and participant consent allow, this is the lesson recording; otherwise the tutor provides a focused recorded recap. Access is limited to the relevant enrolled student or cohort.